Double Dublin flights blow on St Patrick’s Day for Peel Airports

Today might be St Patrick’s Day, but it can’t be a very good day for Peel, who have just lost flights to Dublin from two of the three airports they have in their portfolio. Ryanair are cancelling their cheap Dublin flights from both Doncaster Robin Hood airport and Durham Tees Valley, although they are claiming this is due to the implementation of a €10 tourism tax by the Irish government, rather than anything at the UK end. 

 

This really is the latest in a long string of bad news for Durham Tees Valley airport, who have recently lost a base operator Flyglobespan, cheap flights to Poland from Wizzair, and the Fly bmi feeder route into Heathrow. Let’s hope things don’t get any worse for them. 

 

 

Meanwhile, the outlook does not look so bad at Peel’s other airport in Liverpool. Although Ryanair did announce in February that they would cut back on some routes, the airport has still seen tremendous growth in recent years, and can truly be regarded as one of the great success stories in the UK aviation scene. With a strong Irish community in Liverpool, and Ryanair now established as a healthy competitor to easyJet on the Belfast route, in addition to the wide network of flights to the Irish Republic that they have been operating for several years, we do at least think that flights across the Irish Sea from Liverpool should remain secure for many years to come.

As BMI scrap flights, is Heathrow’s loss just Amsterdam’s gain?

If ever there was a clear-cut argument in favour of Heathrow third runway, then it would be the fact that BMI have just scrapped their flights from Leeds Bradford and Durham Tees Valley to Heathrow. Anyone looking to transfer onto other flights will now have no option but to travel to Amsterdam with KLM instead, as neither of these airports offer hub feeder flights from any other airline.  

Proponents of Heathrow’s third runway argue that the extra capacity that would be created could be used to keep open domestic routes like these two, and also to connect other British cities with Heathrow which have lost their links due to the high taxes imposed on UK domestic flights. Obvious cities which might otherwise support flights into Heathrow would include Liverpool and Inverness in the north and Plymouth and Newquay in the southwest. Meanwhile, opponents argue that people should travel to Heathrow by rail, and that the overall number of flights should be reduced anyway, thus reducing the prospect of these routes from ever becoming viable again. 

Right now, the facts would appear to speak for themselves when it comes to connecting flights, but what about people who just want point-to-point travel between British regional cities and London? We would expect some passengers from Leeds Bradford and Durham to transfer to flights from Manchester and Newcastle respectively, but a far more significant number will travel by train. Both airports also talked about finding replacement airlines to open up new routes into London, but we heard the same rhetoric when VLM scrapped their Liverpool to London City flights. Perhaps Flybe could come onto the scene at Leeds Bradford, where they already have a presence, but I don’t see them operating Gatwick to Durham Tees Valley flights alongside their existing Gatwick to Newcastle route. 

When it comes to the economic arguments about losing jobs to Amsterdam, there is nothing new here. For many years, KLM have offered more feeder flights from UK regional airports than any other airline, and they are set to increase this further still when they open up their new Liverpool to Amsterdam flights at the end of this month. Naturally, this isn’t good news for the UK economy, but we shouldn’t forget that Heathrow’s third runway would come with considerable economic and environmental costs as well. Nor should we forget that the ‘hub and spoke’ model is an inefficient way of operating flights, even if there is always going to be a need for it on some routes.