Flightblogging.com

November 6, 2009

Cheap flights to Denmark - Copenhagen v. Billund?

I’m flying to Billund next week, courtesy of those kind folks at Ryanair, who sold me a one-way flight to Billund from Birmingham for just 1p. There’s various places in Denmark, Sweden and Finland that I want to visit, and I’ll be flying back from Helsinki to Gatwick with easyJet.

A few weeks ago, my brother went to a wedding in Malmo, Sweden, which is just across the fantastic Oresund bridge from Copenhagen. He flew with SAS direct from Birmingham to Copenhagen, and was waxing lyrical about the service. That’s all well and good, but in these price conscious times, it isn’t surprising to find so many people grabbing the cheap flights with Ryanair.

Now I know that everyone’s motivations for travel are different, but if you wanted to visit three of Denmark top attractions, then you might well start in Billund, which is home to Legoland, before heading on to Copenhagen via Odense, which is the birthplace of author Hans Christian Andersen.

Personally, I’m off to immerse myself in Danish urban design, so Odense’s network of urban parks will be the highlight of my trip, but say you are visiting various different places in Denmark, and you have a choice between flying with Ryanair to Billund (flights available from London Stansted, Birmingham, Edinburgh and Dublin) or with another airline to Copenhagen (wider choice of different departure airports).

Which would you do?

November 2, 2009

At last they admit it - flight taxes pay for bank bailouts

At long last, Chancellor Alistair Darling has said what we’ve known all along - that flight taxes (Air Passenger Duty) are used to sort out the dodgy banks, and nothing to do with the environment. Speaking to Northeast website The Journal last week, Darlin said:

I am quite blunt about it, we need to raise money to pay for some of the things we have done. If unemployment goes up there is a cost obviously to the family, there is cost in increased benefits, Northern Rock has cost a lot of money.

Now to be honest, no-one is going to step forward and offer their sympathy for the bankers, but many would still say that the bailouts had to be made in order to save the financial services industry. So, should airlines be made to suffer so another sector can survive?

Well, Darling seems to think so:

But if you think about it, what we are doing is putting a pound on to your average ticket, which about three quarters of people travel on. And you consider the cost of an air ticket, I don’t think a pound is that unreasonable.

The problem of course is that it isn’t “just a pound” on the average flight ticket. Last year, air passenger duty was doubled overnight in a move which saw one of the few taxes to have been reduced under the Labour government get re-stealthed. To make matters worse and add insult to injury, taxes had to be collected on flights which were already paid for - as if the chancellor (and former transport minister) was more interested in act of vengeance than a fair tax. Of course, Mr Darling, as MP for Edinburgh Central, is a fully paid-up member of the “you shouldn’t fly but I will” brigade, and that’s long before we bring up the issue of MP’s expenses.

Unlike some airlines and passengers, I don’t have a problem with air passengers paying their way through a ‘reasonable’ level of taxation - and I fully accept that the aviation industry must pay for its environmental costs. But let’s not forget that whereas motoring taxes are supposed to pay for the upkeep of the roads, usage of airports is already covered by separate airport handling fees levied by the (predominantly) private companies who run Britain’s airports.

Environmental costs should be covered by a global carbon trading agreement, due to be discussed in Copenhagen next month. Of course there’s loads of other arguments about the benefits of switching passengers from short hop flights to high speed rail, but that’s for another time. Or maybe, if that’s where APD funds were being directed, the travelling public wouldn’t mind so much. Mr Darling, if you are reading this, that isn’t an excuse to double APD again on you’re next whim!

 

 

 

 

October 5, 2009

Economic Arguments for Heathrow’s Third Runway in Dragon’s Den

Continued from - Heathrow in Dragon’s Den | Neighbours | Passengers

According to the Institute of Directors (IOD), delaying further investment in Heathrow is costing UK PLC £1 billion each year in lost opportunity and congestion.  Heathrow employs 72,000 people, making it the largest single-site source of employment inthe UK. Yet a third runway is projected to cost a massive £8 billion. How will this investment be recouped? Clearly, BAA believe that they will get their investment back, and the IOD figure would suggest that UK PLC would see a return in just 8 years - not bad for such a huge piece of infrastructure. But what if the airline industry continues to see weak demand?

Heathrow’s attraction

In the current downturn, Heathrow has stayed steady whilst other UK airports have seen demand fall. Heathrow operates at 99% capacity, whereas its main three European rivals (Frankfurt, Amsterdam and Paris Charles De Gaulle) all operate at around 75% capacity. Neither Amsterdam nor Frankfurt has the population to support airports of such size in their own right - these two airports only thrive because of the huge volumes of transfer passengers they attract. Only London and Paris can claim to be true hub cities, where there is substantial latent demand together with the demand for inter-connecting flights, which makes more routes viable.

But does UK PLC really want all these transfer flights?

There is a legitimate argument to say that transfer flights are the most wasteful form of air travel, and that it would be better to encourage people to make such connections at airports like Paris, where there is a lower noise footprint. This is, of course, a blatant ‘not in my back yard’ argument, but in terms of economics, is it really worth building an extra runway just to encourage more transfer passengers? The argument behind such transfers is that they enable huge numbers of routes to be profitable, when they would not otherwise be viable. Typically, 25-40% of passengers on long haul flights to and from Heathrow are making transfers - without these passengers, there would be much fewer routes.

Of course, point to point flying is the most efficient way of getting from A to B, but there are always going to be journeys where the hub and spoke system will be needed - for example from Edinburgh to Entebbe or Oslo to Osaka. Is it really right that these passengers should be forced to be funnelled through Paris, Dubai or Amsterdam, just because Heathrow doesn’t have the capacity?

Verdict: UK PLC clearly sees the advantages of Heathrow’s third runway and says ‘I’m in’. Score so far: 2-1 in favour.

Continue to: Environment | Airlines

April 2, 2009

How many of the UK world Heritage sites have you visited?

As the weaker sterling makes European holidays more expensive and interest rises in staying at home within the UK, how many of the UK world Heritage sites have you managed to visit? Did you know that there are currently 26 sites designated by UNESCO as being of world Heritage standards within the UK. These are:

Bath (city)*
Blaenavon Industrial Landscape
Blenheim Palace *
Canterbury Cathedral, St. Augustine’s Abbey and St. Martin’s Church
Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape* (the Eden project is part of this, surely this must make future lists)
Derwent Valley Mills*
Dorset and East Devon Coast*
Durham Castle and Cathedral*
Edinburgh, New Town*
Edinburgh, Old Town*
Giant’s Causeway and Causeway Coast*
Greenwich (Maritime Heritage)*
Gwynedd - Castles and Town Walls of King Edward
Hadrian’s Wall*
Ironbridge Gorge*
Kew, Royal Botanic Gardens of
Liverpool (surely The Three Graces?)*
London, Tower of*
London, Westminster Abbey*
London, Westminster Palace and Saint Margaret’s Church*
New Lanark
Orkney  (Neolithic heart)
Saltaire
St. Kilda
Stonehenge (plus Avebury and associated sites)
Studley Royal Park, including the Ruins of Fountains Abbey

I have put a star by the ones I’ve managed to get to so far (16 down, ten to go), and hope that I can make it to a few more this year. How I’ve never been to Stonehenge is thoroughly unforgiveable, I’ll have to admit, and I will also be honest and say that it took me four years of study at Edinburgh University before I finally went inside the castle.

What are your local tourism ‘not seen yet’ confessions?

Why is the UK world Heritage website so confusing and inaccurate?

Why are simple lists sometime so difficult to clarify? Back from my visit to Blenheim Palace earlier on today, I remembered the information board which said it was one of 26 world Heritage sites in the UK. How many of these had I visited, I wondered, and how many more do I still have to explore?

I googled ‘world Heritage UK’, and landed on the UK world Heritage sites Portal, part of that wonderful Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Here is one of my pet hates — drop down menus which might give you the opportunity to visit websites one by one, but which don’t let you cut and paste the whole list. Granted, those in the know can do a ‘ view source ‘, but aren’t these government websites supposed to be accessible to all, not just cyber geeks? Besides, stripping down a list from a drop-down menu still takes a bit of fiddly find find and replace work.

By that stage, I’d already clicked on the supposedly interactive map of world Heritage sites in the UK, but this was very messy, with the Cornwall and West Devon mining landscape being represented by a whole sequence of dots, but just one dot being used to represent all the landmarks in central London, sorry I correct myself — all of London, that’s how confusing the map is!

Below the map is a tiny link to a text version, which is what should be offered in the first place, but I’m still confused. According to world Heritage UK, there are 28 sites administered by the British government, and according to Blenheim Palace there are 26 — this difference being made up by outlying territories, but why is there no distinction in this list to pick out Gough Island wildlife reserve (230 miles south-east of Tristan de Cunha, in case you’re interested), or Henderson Island in the Pitcairns? The list actually has 29 sites in it — to add to the confusion Avebury is counted as part of Stonehenge and associated sites, and the Derwent Valley Mills are listed together with the Dorset and east Devon coast for some reason. Then I check through again and see that I have missed the obvious historic town of St George, Bermuda, so now I’m down to 25. Avebury might be listed twice, but it clearly says it is part of the Stonehenge complex, so I can only assume that is meant to be counted once.

Meanwhile, Edinburgh old and new towns are counted as one entity, but as anyone who has visited Auld Reekie will know, there is the small matter of the old Nor Loch, now Princes Street Gardens and Waverley Station, which separates the two from each other. Thankfully, I think I’m back to 26 again.

And when it comes to making the list, they can’t even organise it in proper alphabetical order — i.e. city of Bath should be listed under Bath, city of, surely?

Anyway, now I have finished my rant, and worked out which sites do indeed make up the list of 26 world Heritage sites which are actually in the UK, I can write my blog article about visiting them (at least they won’t be able to make any claim against me for taking Crown copyright information — true plagiarists take all the mistakes with them):

How many UK World Heritage Sites have you visited?

March 23, 2009

20 Reasons To Fly With Ryanair

Last Thursday, the Times carried an article stating 20 reasons why passengers should not fly with Ryanair. Of course, the article made one or two good points that we would agree with, but here is our own response to this article:

1) 1p flights are available, but don’t expect to find cheap flights to Dublin when Ireland or U2 are playing at Croke Park!

Special offers have traditionally been used by retailers to get people through their doors, and Ryanair’s 1p flights are no different to this. One thing to bear in mind is that they don’t always set aside a certain number of seats on each flight to sell at the lowest possible price. Why on earth should they give away seats for nothing if there is a big event on in the destination city? The small print on their current special offers list makes it clear that you will not find cheap flights on a Friday or Sunday, and it also gives the blackout dates to save you the bother of searching during the busy periods. Look out for dates which seem to be set aside for the 1p flights, and be prepared for the same date to be offered for the outbound and return flight. How do you get round this? Simply fly out to one destination, and fly home from a different airport. See our article on playing Ryanair at their own game for further explanation about this.

2) Plenty of other cheap flights are available — if you know when and where to look

Just because you can’t get a flight for 1p doesn’t mean that other good offers aren’t available. If you really do hate Ryanair, then just make a commitment that you won’t allow them the chance to make any money from you. For example, if you book any flight departing the UK, then the first £10 will have to be handed over to the government for Air Passenger Duty, and there will usually be a similar amount given to the airport as a passenger handling fee. As long as you turn up for your flight, Ryanair won’t be able to avoid losing money on these charges.

You can also avoid the tedium of searching through a whole month at a time to find the best possible dates by using a site like Skyscanner.

3) All of the extra charges are avoidable — including the credit and debit card service fee

We really do wonder why people complain so much about the extra charges for things like luggage and credit card handling fees. Why not spend the time un-packing your bag, and only taking things you will really need for your holiday? People tend to bitch about Ryanair not offering any cheap flights for weekend breaks, and then complain at the same time that they are getting overcharged for taking their luggage. Surely you can get away for a couple of days with just a small carry on bag? If you are going away for a little bit longer, it might be cheaper to use a launderette halfway through your holiday — doing so will support the local economy where you are staying, and not Ryanair!

All you need to do to avoid the card handling fees is to get yourself an electron card — see our article about avoiding card charge rip-offs.

4) If you do carry luggage, why do you need to take more than 15 kg?

Some people might deride Ryanair for having a 15 kg luggage limit, but we would again advise travelling light, and of course weighing your bag before you leave for the airport. That way, you can avoid any nasty surprises at the bag drop.

5) So what if Ryanair’s website is rubbish, book your flights and go off and enjoy your holiday!

We have always felt that aesthetically speaking, Ryanair’s website is a nasty piece of work. But so what, it isn’t there to be hung in the Tate Gallery, it is there to make as much money from advertising revenue as possible. That’s why you’ll even see adverts for Ryanair’s rivals on the booking page — Ryanair’s bean counters have worked out that they have more to gain by doing this than they have to lose.

6) An early start means you will see more

I’m not much of an early riser either, but having to leave the UK at some ungodly hour means that you will also get your destination much earlier as well. This means more time to explore. The Times article then complains about anti-social flights later in the evening, complaining about arriving late at night and not finding anywhere to stay — has the author never heard of the concept of booking hotels in advance?

7) One person’s middle of nowhere is another’s quirky place to explore

A few years ago, I made the trek out to Frankfurt Hahn, and had a pleasant afternoon’s train journey through the Mosel Valley before catching my flight home. Granted, Frankfurt international airport is much closer to the city centre, but I wasn’t going to pay hundreds of pounds more, especially when I only wanted a one-way flight. There is always a way of making your trip interesting — besides, the so-called Ryanairports only account for a small percentage of Ryanair’s total destination list — the definition is of course a little bit subjective, but we would say that there are only about 10 airports which really are in the middle of nowhere, when compared to the main city airport which other airlines serve.

8) No one makes you buy anything on board

If you don’t like the prices of Ryanair’s on-board service, then just don’t buy anything. We don’t ever hear people complaining about trains having trolleys on board (or stations charging for toilets for that matter), so why should airlines be any different?

9) You can always block out any annoying announcements with noise cancelling headphones

Of course, these announcements are an annoying form of noise pollution, but Ryanair are not the only offender here. Thankfully, they can be mitigated by purchasing a pair of noise cancelling headphones — savvy travellers are usually the ones you will see with a pair of Bose headphones. They don’t come cheap, but they do provide you with in-flight bliss, and they will also protect you from that other in-flight irritation which can disturb you on just about any airline — the screaming baby.

10) Free seating means you don’t have to pay to get a good seat, so just turn up to the gate early, or quit worrying about it.

Those airlines which offer assigned seating are increasingly charging customers to get the seats they want. Ryanair offer priority boarding for £3 each way — this is one extra which is worth considering if you are travelling as part of a group, but bear in mind that many other passengers think the same way, so you might be just as well off without it. Remember too that some airports will require you to travel by bus between the terminal and the aircraft, and that people often board the plane from the front and the rear, so that seat which you have your eyes on might end up getting taken by somebody else.

At the end of the day, what’s the worst that could happen? You might end up having to sit next to someone you don’t know for a couple of hours, but that can either mean a possibility for an interesting conversation, or an opportunity to keep yourself to yourself and read or listen to music. Either way, it is not as if you are being asked to share the same bed with someone against your will, so why get too worried about it?

11) When the flights are so cheap, why bother seeking a refund?

I really do wonder what all the fuss is about with people who expect a refund off Ryanair. Even if something does go horribly wrong, they will only usually be liable for the cost you have paid for your flight. No airline is ever going to cover you for the consequential losses (i.e. hotel bookings, car hire etc) you might suffer if your flight is delayed.

There’s two ways round this — either get a fully comprehensive travel insurance policy which will cover you in the event of such problems occurring, or just accept that from time to time things will go wrong, but that more often than not, your journey will be trouble-free. Despite all the hype, Ryanair have fewer delays and cancellations, and fewer lost bags than any other major European airline.

12) Flights can be so cheap that you can book them without even having to worry about whether you will take the trip or not.

Why not take advantage of Ryanair’s special offers, and book yourself a few trips away. You can always decide closer to the time whether or not you can actually take the trip. If you don’t turn up, you will just lose the small fee you have paid your flight, and you could probably book 3 or four special offer flights for the price of just one return flight with other airlines.

13) No other airline can boast of putting places like Alghero, Haugesund and Zweibrucken on the map.

Just as we think we have all destinations covered, Ryanair open up somewhere new that we’ve never heard of. The intrepid traveller could spend months if not years hopping between all the different places Ryanair serves, and never get bored. As well as connecting the better known places on the European map, Ryanair really do have the ability to open up the economies of numerous undiscovered regional destinations. Of course, there is a flip side to this — routes can get dumped just as quickly, so perhaps this should give you even more impetus to go out and explore somewhere you see on Ryanair’s destination list that you think might be interesting.

14) Other people clicking on adverts and buying extra services means that budget minded travellers like myself can travel for next to nothing

Ryanair make just about as much money from ancillary revenues (bookings made through adverts on their website, responses to e-mail offers, in-flight sales etc) than they do from the flights themselves, so they can still give away flights for next to nothing on the assumption that many passengers will then book a hotel or hire car with them. Of course, there is no obligation for anyone to do so, giving budget minded travellers like myself the opportunity to travel for pennies, without any extra costs.

15) Ryanair tend to offer only one brand of car hire, airport parking etc — so you can come to a site like ourselves and find a lot more opportunities to get a better deal!

A lot of the time, Ryanair are relying on people’s laziness so that they can make money on extra services. For Example, Ryanair only offer car hire through Hertz, or airport parking through BCP — who is to say that these are always going to be the cheapest?

16) Ryanair’s growth and dealmaking has been so prolific that they also now fly from major airports, so I can get cheap flights from Birmingham airport, which is just 10 minutes away from my house.

When Ryanair first came onto the scene, they concentrated virtually exclusively on out of the way low-cost airports. As they have grown, they have expanded into other major airports which have had room for them, often taking advantage of cheap off-peak slots. So if you are looking for cheap flights from the UK, then Ryanair now have a major presence at airports like London Gatwick, Birmingham, Manchester and Edinburgh, as well is their more traditional hubs such as Stansted, Liverpool and Glasgow Prestwick. On mainland Europe, you’ll now find Ryanair offering cheap flights to Bologna instead of Forli, and offering a whole range of cheap flights to Spain using airports like Madrid, Malaga and Alicante, which we would previously have thought they would avoid completely.

17) Some people might criticise Ryanair for their environmental record, but mile for mile, they are one of the greenest airlines in the sky.

Whatever opinions one might have about the wider environmental impacts of flying, Ryanair exclusively use the next generation Boeing 737-800, which is one of the most efficient available, in terms of fuel burned per passenger per mile. Ryanair’s commitment to low costs and either using uncongested airports, or using major airports when they are less busy, helps to reduce their fuel burn further.

Whilst some commentators might criticise Ryanair’s aggressive marketing policy, their continued usage of special offers ensures that Ryanair’s aircraft are kept as full as possible.

18) If you want to fly with another airline, then you can at least be grateful that Ryanair’s presence in the market has brought down costs for everyone.

Flightmapping.com certainly isn’t here to act as Ryanair’s mouthpiece — they certainly do enough of their own publicity, even if they do give us plenty to comment on. So we should just say that we’d love you to spend as much time as possible on Flightmapping.com, and book cheap flights with some of the airlines that pay to advertise on our website (Ryanair don’t).

Whoever you choose to fly with, don’t forget that Ryanair have helped make flights cheap for everyone. Just this weekend I was having dinner with the owner of another cheap flights website and a colleague within our industry, and he was talking about taking flights to Salzburg with Ryanair for £80, which I regarded as expensive. If he had said that 10 years ago, I would have told him he got a bargain. As it happened, he only booked his flights are few days beforehand, and was travelling over the weekend, so he’s still got a good deal.

19) When Michael O’Leary said he was thinking about talking for toilet usage, he was just taking the piss

This so-called ‘idea’ was suggested jokingly by Mike Rutter of Flybe back in September 2006, and it comes up from time to time. As usual, O’Leary’s outburst was well timed to grab headlines and promote Ryanair’s latest offer. A few days later, he confirmed that they had no plans to introduce such a scheme.

20) I don’t care what other people think of Michael O’Leary, I have quite a lot of time for the guy

Somehow I really don’t think that Michael O’Leary is bothered that some people love to hate him, as long as they are always talking about Ryanair. I have met him on three occasions, and always found him to be extremely charming and good-humoured. Considering the amount of distrust that figures like Sir Fred Goodwin have made us have in The City, then we really should be grateful to have people like Michael O’Leary (and let’s not forget other aviation pioneers like Sir Stelios and Sir Richard) around to shake things up a bit and tell it as it is.

I don’t want to give Ryanair any more publicity than I need to, but I’ll have to admit that my next flight will be with them, so I hope I won’t have to eat any of my words. Out of all the times I’ve flown with Ryanair so far, I’ve never had more than about a 15 minute delay, so maybe my time is due!

Powered by WordPress